Sedia – The Alchemy of Stone
Sedia, Ekaterina. The Alchemy of Stone. Rockville, MD; Prime, 2008. 301 pp.
The Alchemy of Stone came in trailing a lot of praise. It tells the story of Mattie; an intelligent automaton; who finds herself caught up in a political maelstrom while the steampunk city she calls home crumbles around her. An alchemist by trade, Mattie is approached by the gargoyles who wish her to find some way to prevent them from eventually turning to stone. Though ostensibly emancipated, the mechanic who made her refuses to relinquish to the only key that can re-wind her clockwork heart. Alchemy has been described as “A gorgeous meditation on what it means to not be human.” (1)
I think Alchemy had a lot of layers, sub-narrative, meta-narratives & depth. But I’m not sure that really got it. Considering all the hype it came in with, I was expecting to be “wowed!” Instead, I was only “…meh ’d.” Again; I may not have gotten it. There were definitely some feminist undertones which, I think, eluded me & I’m sure that there was some sort of discussion on the relationship between the creator (God?) & the creation (mankind?). There was also this whole is-progress-&-technology-really-all-that-worth-it thing going on. There’s personifications of self-sacrificing compassion (the Soul-Smoker), mortality (the gargoyles), a creator who is both loving & cruel (Loharri), the victims of racism & xenophobia (Niobe), & radical ideology (Sebastian). In fact, in writing this, I’m wondering if maybe there was just too much in there. Sedia’s world is wonderful blend of steampunk-fantasy – thoroughly enjoyable, but no where near fleshed-out enough for me. It was too descriptive to offer the mystique of the unsaid, but not descriptive enough to satisfy. I wanted MORE. A classmate of mine described herself as a ‘greedy reader’ & I really liked that phrase – it definitely applies to me, as well. There was so much in Alchemy that really should have taken hold of my tiny little brain & ran off with my imagination; but it didn’t. Not once did I feel compelled to pick the book back up after setting it down. Reading it wasn’t a chore, mind you – it was pleasant, just not compelling. Mattie herself is really the gemstone of the tale – she’s sweet & naïve & altogether charming.
I’m giving this book a Check it Out rating. It strikes me as a good book club-style book; there’s lots to discuss, but I think it almost demands that sort of dialogue – reading it on my own felt, as I said, somewhat lacking. I don’t think it’s steampunky enough to appeal to steampunkers, nor does it feel fantasy enough to appeal to true fabulists. It may, however, be a good recommendation for someone who’s not really into either genre, but that wants something truly unique.
